A critical comparison of the church-state jurisprudence of Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Justice Sandra Day O'Connor
نویسندگان
چکیده
by the committee members below to meet the thesis requirement for graduation with honors in Political Science at the University of Richmond.
منابع مشابه
A Supreme Court Primer for the Public
In writing The Supreme Court: How It Was, How It Is, William H. Rehnquist becomes the first sitting Chief Justice to author a book that explains the workings of the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court is not a treatise on constitutional doctrine; rather, it surveys the "borderland between American history and constitutional law" (p. 8). Chief Justice Rehnquist's book succeeds in providing the "int...
متن کاملMeasuring Internal Influence on the Rehnquist Court: An Analysis of Non-Majority Opinion Joining Behavior
As one of the few studies to examine internal influence among Justices on the United States Supreme Court, this Note seeks to identify the most influential individuals on the Rehnquist Court. Using an empirical analysis of non-majority opinion joining behavior, this Note examines two time periods separately: the entire Rehnquist Court (the 1986 to 2004 Terms) and the time when the membership on...
متن کاملState Succession in respect of “Right to Reparation” in Jurisprudence of International Court of Justice
Transferring right to reparation, as one of the consequences of succession of states, has always been debatable. International court of justice, meanwhile, has issued decisions which has consisted of the said issue in its proceedings, that is necessiating to revisiting them. The article in hands, explains the views of international court of justice (ICJ) on how the judicial organ of the united ...
متن کاملDoctrinal and Strategic Influences of the Chief Justice the Decisional Significance of the Chief Justice
The office of the Chief Justice of the United States has received considerable renown but has been the subject of relatively little research. It is common to refer to the Chief as primus inter pares, but little attention has been paid to the relative significance of the primus as opposed to the pares. The office of the Chief Justice has been considered “second in national authority and prestige...
متن کاملBargaining Power in the Supreme Court: Evidence from Opinion Assignment and Vote Switching
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].. The University of Chicago Press and Southern Political Sc...
متن کامل